Morality is given to you by others, your parents, your friends, your culture, your religion etc. It's origin is deeply egoistical and it starts when awareness or understanding is missing. A man of understanding will need no rules, because he knows that everything imposed on him will make him plastic and deprive him of his authenticity. How can you say to a child:"don't be childish". It cannot be not childdish, that's impossible for him, he cannot be what he is not. So the child will learn how to act, because it will be very difficult for him to resist his parents. In this way the child becomes unreal.
So a man who want's to be good is at the same degree evil, his intention can only be:"I am holier than you".
Morality has the reason in itself, which is a very airy-fairy way indeed. Man has never known what is "good" or "bad", these names are always a good way to start wars. If you free yourself from conditioning you will just know what's right and wha'ts wrong. Then you love yourself and love is the only truth.
Sonntag, 8. Juni 2008
Abonnieren
Kommentare zum Post (Atom)
6 Kommentare:
"you will just know what's right and wha'ts wrong. Then you love yourself and love is the only truth."
Das ist auch Moral.
"Der Ausdruck Moral bezeichnet dabei das, was als richtiges Handeln angesehen wird, sei es von einem Individuum, einer Gruppe oder einer ganzen Kultur. Der Ausdruck kann deskriptiv und normativ verwendet werden.
Moral beschreibt, was Menschen faktisch für richtig halten, bzw. was sie gemäß ihrer Vorstellungen vom richtigen Handeln tun."
Genau das hast du geschrieben, das ist ne Ansicht und keine Seuche ^^
Alright, in the second last sentence "right" and "wrong" is supposed to mean love and fear. When you have a deep understanding all what you do is love, and how can that be wrong? To know what I mean with real love check the L.o.v.e. article. That's not moral, that's beyond morality. Then there's no reason for morality. I am not AGAINST morality, in former times it helped organize the social life and avoid complications. But for more evolved people it is a hindrance. I don't murder because it is bad, but because I AM the other person also and have empathy. To murder is not bad, that's an associaton. But there is no need to murder if you live naturally or had the chance to be raised naturally. certain "bad" things can happen from acing moral, but not from acting out of real love. You know if you are amoral, sometimes you will act moral,sometimes immoral but always lovingly because in love there is no ego.
Vegans for example are created by morality or social conditioning, or have you missed watching nature :-)?
"Morality labels what is the right action": All the actions you do from waking up to chosing your food you do because you think it is the right action for you at this time. But most of these actions are not moral, you do them because you feel your own understanding leading you towards these decisions because it makes you happy or serves a greater purpose, and that's not morality that's you. Morality is a judgement and all judgements are based in fear.
"I am not AGAINST morality, in former times it helped organize the social life and avoid complications."
No, you misunderstood my point. Morality does not have to consist of superimposed rules by communities. The moment you decide to base your actions on your own happiness or the pursuit of some nebulous "greater purpose", this attitude is defined as your very own morality.
""right" and "wrong" is supposed to mean love and fear. When you have a deep understanding all what you do is love, and how can that be wrong?"
True Infallibility? Well... no. What is your point here? Of course you should maintain your morals because you consider them "right", which means that you pondered about and justified them for yourself.
1)Necessary to understand this is to shift that what we do from "mind" to heart or intelligence or non-thinking whatever you wanna call it. I think it is not possible to pursue happiness with the "mind"; nobody has ever accomplished that nor has anyone ever invented his greater purpose. This shift is not "easy" to take because you have to do it experiential also.
2)Love has to do with acceptance, understanding, compassion, courage, respect. Can having compassion or respecting someone really be FALSE?
The question cannot arise.
You cannot have too much compassion that it will kill someone, right? ;-)
Well, love isn't wrong, that's why you replaced "right" with "love", that is understandable, why not.
"Necessary to understand this is [...] non-thinking [...] I think it is not possible to pursue happiness with the "mind" "
You contradict yourself there. Thinking should be vital to explore this matter correctly. What is one's love is another's hatred.
Kommentar veröffentlichen